Monthly Archive for January, 2010

SEO and Plagiarism : Duplicate Content

seo and plagiarismSearch Engine Optimization, or SEO, is a relatively new field that has grown symbiotically with the popularity of large search engines like Google.   Essentially, every website can be found through Google and Co. by searching for the right keywords.  The process of search engine optimization makes a website as relevant as possible for target keywords based on the site’s audience or business niche.  For example, if a website is selling kitchen utensils online, they would want to show up as a result when someone searches for ‘kitchen utensils’.

Google’s algorithm for organizing search results is fairly complex; it is the job of an SEO specialist to know what specific factors will affect a website’s ranking.   Among SEO experts, there are several common best practices for optimizing a website.  Some of these include creating title tags with the correct keywords, using a proper keyword density within a page’s copy, as well as updating a website with fresh and relevant content on a regular basis.   The content writing side of SEO is what I’d like to touch on and where plagiarism can become a dangerous adversary to an SEO specialist or firm.

SEO professionals will make a point to keep a website’s blog or news section fresh with keyword specific stories because Google’s algorithm deems this good for page relevance.   SEO professionals also commonly distribute articles on off-site directories and blogs with links that point back to a website because these incoming links  provide authority to the website.

Because many SEO techniques are based on quantity and not quality, some people will try to churn out articles as fast as possible in an effort to push a site’s ranking up.  Many resort to plagiarism to make the cut, copying other people’s online content with a few minor modifications and distributing it elsewhere for their own purposes.  There are also many foreign SEO firms and individuals that don’t have a strong English language base and need to resort to plagiarism because they can’t properly write the articles themselves.

For a large SEO firm that employs or outsources a number of writers to serve their client’s needs, it is integral to make sure the content being produced is original.  Plagiarized SEO articles can both undermine a company’s efforts to create unique content for a website as well as can endanger an SEO firm’s professional integrity.     It makes sense that both SEO firms and individual SEO specialists take the time to check their articles for duplicate content before the distribution phase.  It also is in the interest of an SEO professional to make sure no one else is plagiarizing their original content.

iThenticate is a cutting edge plagiarism checker that is perfect for SEO specialists and firms.  Simply upload (or cut and paste) an article and it will be compared to billions of documents in repositories that include shallow and deep web content  (current and archived), as well as a tremendous breadth of proprietary content.   This includes a comparison with content from global publishers, worldwide aggregators and syndicators including newswires, newspapers, periodicals, journals, magazines, e-books, reference encyclopedias, academic textbooks and more.

Uncovering the Reality of Plagiarism

light bulb bookA recent report about the University of Nottingham states that instances of plagiarism within the school have risen nearly 700% since 2004.  The records filed through the Freedom of Information act seem to highlight an alarming increase in students submitting plagiarized work.

The University of Nottingham, however, argues that the perceived statistic is not due to an increase in plagiarism, but rather an increase in plagiarism detection capabilities.  In 2006, the university invested in plagiarism detection software, enabling professors to easily cross check a student’s submitted work with a variety of extensive databases.  Even though the number of cheating students may have held steady throughout the decade, catching more students with modern technology could account for the 700% increase.   One could also argue that since 2004,  increased access to Internet resources has equipped students with an easier path to plagiarism.

In either case, plagiarism is a reality at universities and detecting duplicate content is the first step to stopping it.   The same plagiarism problem that universities face is mirrored within the working world.  Publishers, research institutes and media firms are beginning to open their eyes to the reality of plagiarism.   Even if these industries haven’t noticed plagiarism in the past, it doesn’t mean it hasn’t been occurring right under their nose.

Over the past decade, many high profile cases reinforce the notion that plagiarism is a constant reality, and not a ‘here and there’ occurrence.  One such case, Jayson Blair of the New York Times, uncovered a history of repeat instances of plagiarism from other publications.   Although the case became big news in the light of media coverage, in reality the plagiarism was undetected and ongoing for a long period of time.   Since then,  increased access to Internet resources most likely means even more cases of undetected plagiarism.

Although it is alarming when rampant statistics or extreme cases of plagiarism are revealed, we can rest assured that knowing the reality of the situation is far better than being in the dark.  Whether a business has 1000 employees or is a one man operation, it has become due diligence to verify the originality of any submitted works.  The reality of plagiarism allows us to move forward; in industries like publishing it makes the difference between a reputable and untrustworthy publication.

Citations:

Gant, Will. “Plagiarism up 700% at University.”  Impact Magazine 20 Jan. 2010 http://www.impactnottingham.com/2010/01/plagiarism-up-700-at-university/