A recent case of plagiarism emerged from the Daily Beast online news site late last week. Daily Beast author Gerald Posner admitted to copying several sentences from a piece in the Miami Herald. Although the incidence of plagiarism was clear and he admitted that it was an act of plagiarism, Posner claimed that it was ‘inadvertent.’ The editors at the Daily Beast also admitted that it was an act of plagiarism, but also labeled Posner’s act as ‘inadvertent.’
Did he accidentally see the Miami Herald Article and remember the wording? Or did he have the Herald on his lap as he typed up his piece? We could argue all day about whether Posner had intent to commit plagiarism and we’d most likely come out with no black and white answer. The question is : does intent matter in a case of plagiarism?
Plagiarism.org’s response to ‘does intention matter?’ :
“…there are different punishments for willful infringement, or deliberate plagiarism, and innocent infringement, or accidental plagiarism. To distinguish between these, courts recognize what is called the good faith defense. If you can demonstrate, based on the amount you borrowed and the way you have incorporated it in your own work, that reasonably believed what you did was fair use, chances are that your sentence will be lessened substantially.”
As far as punishment is concerned, just as in criminal law, deliberate intent does make a difference with plagiarism Based on the striking similarity between the Daily Beast piece and the Miami Herald article, it would be difficult to prove in court that Posner did not deliberately plagiarize from another source.
So intent matters as far as punishment, but in terms of detecting an incidence of plagiarism, intent plays no part in determining what is considered to be duplicate content. iThenticate’s Plagiarism Checker technology creates a Similarity Report based on the extensive and quantitative comparison of articles. This similarity report doesn’t know the difference between an author that deliberately or accidentally plagiarized. iThenticate simply tells us where the plagiarism occurred.
There certainly are cases of inadvertent plagiarism out there. However, it makes sense that editors and authors side-step even getting into the debate of intent by avoiding plagiarism all together with the proper technology.
Citations:
Shafer, Jack. “Plagiarism at the Daily Beast” Slate 5 Feb. 2010 http://www.slate.com/id/2243850/
Plagiarism FAQs - Plagiarism.org, iParadigms LLC. Retrieved February 8, 2010, from http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_plagiarism_faq.html
Poetry is a literary form that depends on unique content. Poems are distinguished on various levels of theme, verse, form and rhyme, with the end goal of leaving a reader with a message or emotional response to the written language. There are several paths a poet can take to success, from publishing their work online to getting picked up by a professional journal or publisher. No matter which direction a poet takes, their livelihood depends on maintaining the integrity of their work as their own. If a poet’s work is plagiarized and republished without consent, it not only devalues the poem itself, but also undermines the writer’s vocation and livelihood.
Search Engine Optimization, or SEO, is a relatively new field that has grown symbiotically with the popularity of large search engines like Google. Essentially, every website can be found through Google and Co. by searching for the right keywords. The process of search engine optimization makes a website as relevant as possible for target keywords based on the site’s audience or business niche. For example, if a website is selling kitchen utensils online, they would want to show up as a result when someone searches for ‘kitchen utensils’.